Gringo's Associates
The Last Party - The Disillusioned Kid - Linz's blog - Awesome Linky Links - Bucky's blog - Kate's blog - Erin's blog - Birmo's Journalspace - Neo's Myspace - Jenna's Myspace - Site design by expojah

Archives
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
January 2007
February 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
September 2007
March 2008
March 2009
May 2009

Monday, November 29, 2004

Boarding Flight 759 To Utopia

In this current social structure, is it possible to love more than one individual? Not talking poligamy as it is practiced by Mormons, and other Fundamentalists, because I feel that this is a system that is abusive to women, and does not provide a satisfactory emotional situation. I'm imagining more than the free-love of the seventies, which was just as open to abuse. cos it's not about sex, it's about the emotional aftershocks. beyond the core couple, this staple that society or genetics has developed, sexual relationships outside of this have consequences on the psyche, in particular, guilt. I'm inclined to believe it is a direct result of the influence of the roman catholic church on western society, particularly noting the concepts of sin, original sin, confession, and forgiveness.

But Why Is It So? Would It Be Better Another Way? Imagine you could have more than one meaningful relationship at the same time. Many people do now, but at a social and emotional cost- they may suffer guilt, be unable to completely involve either partner into many aspects of their live, and end up favouring one partner at the emotional cost of the other. Jelousy, Envy, Spite, many of the darker emotions rise up when a person "cheats" on another. What if society told people that sex wasn't meant to be stuck in the binds of marriage? That you don't have to break up with someone because you've found someone else? these are just questions, becuase i'm not an anthropologist, nor do i have the tenure to develop a proper thesis. I just feel that monogamy has its downsides too, and many of its' positives are negated in a sufficiently supportive community. "Sticking together for the kids" makes little sense when daddy keeps beating mommy with a chair, perpetuating an existence of domestic violence.

Consent is Important. This change in society could only work in a complete rebirth of society, i believe. if there is one example of jelousy, then doubt into the viability of this structural event would occur, and then boom, back to jelousy again.
posted by Keegan at 6:25 pm

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home



----------------